@ntHony’S bloG

If you can’t learn to do it well, learn to enjoy doing it badly.

New Jersey Vs. TLO Supreme Court Case

The case of New Jersey vs. TLO was appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States in 1984. Events that led up to the case being brought up to the Supreme Court began at Piscataway High School in Middlesex County, New Jersey, United States. Two female freshmen attending the school were caught smoking cigarettes in the bathroom by a teacher. They were later interrogated by the assistant vice-principal (Theodore Choplick) at the school. One of the two girls had admitted to smoking while the other, known as TLO, had denied the accusations of her smoking. Choplick had not believed this girl at all, and later began to search her purse and belongings. Cigarettes, marijuana, and other drug-related paraphernalia were found. TLO had finally confessed when they took her to the police station. However, TLO didn’t go down without a fight. She argued that the search of her purse went against her rights stated in the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.Because of this, the case was later appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court decided that the search and seizure by school officials without a warrant was constitutional as long as it was justifiable. When the assistant vice-principal was searching the purse, it was believed to be upon probable cause. Probable cause is “a reasonable belief that a crime has been committed.” So, the court decided that the search was reasonable because under the circumstances of that situation, reason to suppose TLO had drugs was justifiable.

I agree with the decision of the United States Supreme Court because everything was justifiable. When the other girl had already admitted to smoking, suspicion had arose with TLO and how she denied the accusations. Having the fact that suspicion led to the search and seizure, it was later proven justifiable with drug paraphernalia found in her purse and because of probable cause.





7 Comments »

   Adolfo wrote @ April 2nd, 2008 at 9:51 am

good job on your report………….

I think they had the right ot search in her car to find more evidance. T.L.O who denided smoking. If the teacher said that they were smoking then that means that they can search their purse and car.

   Francesca wrote @ April 2nd, 2008 at 10:25 am

I agree with your opinion. Even though that school officials went through the students purse without a search warrant it was tolerable. Like the other cases i have read with similar reason for suing - Amendment 4 - it helped it bring the case to a conclusion. They found out whether the student was guilty or otherwise.

   Maria wrote @ April 2nd, 2008 at 10:40 am

I think what anthony had said was
clearly understandable. It was justifiable because
the girl lied in the first place trying to deny she didnt
smoke while the other admitted.

   Eduardo wrote @ April 2nd, 2008 at 10:43 am

I agree with you. It was a good thing that the assistant vice-principal to check TLO’s purse because they found cigarettes, marijuana, and other drugs. Even thought the assistant vice-president did not have a warrant, it was a good thing the person checked. This is how they found the suspect guilty.

   Michelle wrote @ April 2nd, 2008 at 10:45 am

i agreed with both anthony and francesca and maria

   vanessa08 wrote @ April 2nd, 2008 at 10:49 am

I agree with anthonys opinion. It was justifiable because of the probable cause. Anyways they still suspected of TLO. They found out that the student was guilty. Which was really good because they did bring the case to a conclusion.

   Robert wrote @ April 2nd, 2008 at 11:12 am

The case that you did I liked it because it involved peoples privacy. The only thing is that I would disagree wtih your descision to agree with the court. Either way I thought that you did a good job with this because there was good info.

Your comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>